Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) vs Mibro GS Pro 2

Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) and Mibro GS Pro 2 are watches both released in 2025 by different brands, with overlapping phone compatibility. This comparison separates the catalog's listed specifications from missing information and approximate values. It covers 18 fields, including 10 exact differences; it does not choose a winner.

Specifications side by side

FieldGalaxy Watch Ultra (2025)Mibro GS Pro 2
Release year20252025 (approx.)
Case sizes47 mm47 mm (approx.)
DisplaySuper AMOLED, Always-On1.43-inch AMOLED 466x466
Brightness3000 nits1200 nits
Battery, as listed590 mAh, up to 60 hrs (AOD on) / 100 hrs (Power Saving)Not listed
Operating systemWear OS + One UI WatchMibro OS
Phone compatibilityAndroidAndroid, iPhone
Cellular connectioneSIM · LTENone
Water rating10ATM + IP685ATM
GlassSapphireNot listed
Case materialTitaniumDual-color silicone/woven, 49.6-61.6g
GPSDual-frequency GNSSDual-frequency GNSS
MapsNoNo
Payment systemSamsung WalletNone listed
Plan requirementNot requiredNot required
Listed sensors and featuresSleep apnea, Body composition (BIA), Blood pressure trend, ECG, HRV, SpO2, Skin temperatureHeart rate, SpO2
Safety featuresFall detection, siren, SOS callingNone listed
Hardware flashlightNoNo

"Not listed" means the catalog has no usable value for that field. It does not mean the watch lacks the feature. Approximate values stay visible but do not support the difference count or numeric deltas.

Where they differ

Where they are the same

Which one fits you

Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) is listed as a watch compatible with Android. Start with that phone requirement before comparing the other rows. The exact differences above are a way to identify which listed specifications matter to your use, not evidence that one model is better in every respect.

Mibro GS Pro 2 is listed as a watch compatible with Android, iPhone. Start with that phone requirement before comparing the other rows. The exact differences above are a way to identify which listed specifications matter to your use, not evidence that one model is better in every respect.

Information is missing on at least one side for: Battery, as listed, Glass. Those rows are excluded from the exact difference count.

Related pages